Ok. I'm trying to keep a hot streak here. This is two weeks in a row. I am very happy about this.
And there is a second reason that I am very now. This week, I would like to offer something that I have thought of myself. That probably means there is something wrong with it - so I'll leave it to you to figure out. Almost like a riddle.
At the very end of this week's parasha, the Torah, in only one verse, praises Moshe Rabbeniu.
וְהָאִישׁ מֹשֶׁה, עָנָו מְאֹד- מִכֹּל הָאָדָם אֲשֶׁר, עַל-פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה.
"The man ("ish" - איש), Moshe, was the most humble, more so than any other person ("Adam" - אדם) on the face of the earth."(Bamidbar 12:3)
Now, some will argue (they're wrong, but that won't stop them) that we don't have to learn something from every story in the Torah. Some will say that the Torah records historical events. There doesn't have to be a message in everything that the Torah says! Well, I'm not going to respond to those people now, except I will just say that I believe they are wrong. I believe that we can learn something from every letter in the Torah.
If I'm not going to respond to that now (maybe one day), then why do I bring it? Because this verse (the one I quoted) is not part of a conversation. It's not like one person told another person, "You know, that Moshe, he was very humble." Nope. If you look at the verses, you will see that there is a story going on, and suddenly, the Torah interjects and just throws in this information. Whom is the Torah speaking to? Miriam? Nope. Aharon? No, not him, either. It is speaking to the reader. To you. To me. To Rav Ovadia Yosef. To whoever is reading and learning the Torah. This praise wasn't said to anyone, and wasn't part of any conversation. It was placed in the Torah, by Hashem, and it is directed to the reader, and only to the reader. So those who suggest the the Torah quotes stories cannot say that this is simply part of a story. This is here to teach us something. After all, it is directed towards us! So if you don't take away something from it, you're missing the entire point.
I'm sure there are many things that one can learn from this passuk. I would like to offer something novel. Well the truth is, I don't know if it is novel. I came up with it either last night or this morning, I can't even remember. But I think it is true, and I can imagine that someone else says something like this. But until someone points out who preceded me in saying it, I will claim it for myself.
This passuk uses two different words that both mean "man." "Ish" and "Adam." Both of them mean "person." However, they have different connotations. The word "ish" implies "man of stature," an important person. Like when you say "ish," you're supposed be taken back and say, "Oh, wow! We're dealing with that type of person." There are many examples where ish is used to describe a man of stature. In fact, there is a pasuk in the az yashir that writes, "Hashem ish milchama!" - Hashem is the man of war. The word ish even is used in relation to Hashem.
The word "adam" has more of a negative connotation. It comes from the word "adama" - land, earth. Man of the earth. Lowly person. [Editor's note: My name is Adam. It hurts for me to write this. I'm thinking about legally changing my name it Ish. Ish Sabzevari. I like the sound of that. No?]
After explaining these different connotations, I think there is something very deep in this passuk, and I would like to share it with you.
Moshe Rabbeinu was the greatest of all men. He spoke to Hashem, one-on-one, consciously, "face-to-face." There was a very close relationship between Hashem and Moshe. Not only that, but he was the only one who ever has such a relationship. He was the greatest of all prophets. Now, you may ask, "Adam, what are you saying? How can you possibly know that Moshe was greater than all other prophets? What? Are you a prophet? Do you have some prophet-level-measuring-radar, or something?" So I'll let you in on my secret. At the very end of the Torah, there is a verse that states, וְלֹא-קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה, אֲשֶׁר יְדָעוֹ ה', פָּנִים אֶל-פָּנִים. - "And there has not ever arisen a prophet with Israel like Moshe, whom Hashem knew face-to-face." So we know that Moshe was pretty cool, you know.
Let me ask you a question. Do you think he had a right to be haughty? Like, do you think he did anything that was worth being proud of? Like, did he ever do anything cool in his life? OF COURSE! He was the closest man to G-d in this world! That's something to feel good about! I think he would be justified in being proud.
Comparatively speaking, let's say Moshe is an "ish." Basically, everyone else will be considered an "adam." Compared to Moshe, everyone is on a level lower.
Now lets go back to the pasuk for a second:
"The man ("ish" - איש), Moshe, was the most humble, more so than any other person ("Adam" - אדם) on the face of the earth."
Why does the Torah have to call Moshe an "ish." Why can't it just write, "Moshe was the most humble..."?
I think the Torah is trying to stress that in a world that Moshe was an "ish," and everyone else around was merely an "adam," (when compared to him,) he was still the humblest. To further stress that the word "adam" has a negative connotation, the Torah repeats the word when is says מִכֹּל הָאָדָם אֲשֶׁר, עַל-פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה. The word "adama" is repeated to stress that an "adam" is a man of "adama," an earthly man. On the contrary, Moshe was an ish, who would speak with Hashem "face-to-face."
I think the Torah is stressing here that one should not be haughty, even if he has reason to be haughty. If there was one man who would be justified in being haughty, it would be Moshe Rabbeinu. Nevertheless, he was not haughty. In fact, he was the humblest of all men. And that is what made him an "ish" is a world of adams. You may think that you are better than other people. And you really are. Like you are probably worth more than __________ (fill in the blank). But that doesn't mean anything. Wouldn't you agree that Moshe was worth more than _______________, too? He probably was. Nevertheless, Moshe was still more humble than _________. You should be, too.
My point is, you may think that you have the right to be haughty when comparing yourself to certain people. And you probably are better than they. But don't be mistaken - you are wrong in feeling exalted over others, even if you are better than they.
I don't know if I am clear at all in this email. Please let me know if you know of anyone who says this, or if there is something wrong with it that I am missing.
Thank you very much,
Shabbat Shalom!
Avraham Ish Sabzevari